Main menu


Unveiling the World of Law: Meet the Lawyer - Reflscape

What was the legal profession in ancient Rome?

In ancient Greece, or, to be more exact, in historic Athens, the overall socio-political state of affairs changed distinctly inimical to the improvement of a real legal career. ' The autonomous and popular people of Athens, at least during the alternate half of the fifth and the first half of the fourth century B.C., displayed a pronounced and continuing aversion to professional counsel. 

Meet the Lawyer
Unveiling the World of Law Meet the Lawyer - Reflscape

This aversion, it seems, was in keeping with that general and unfortunate dislike and distrust of any kind of professional expertise that was so characteristic of the Athenian republic. The people of Athens appear to have believed that by his expertness, a professional man set himself apart from and, hence, against the popular community in that.

In sum, it changed into held by numerous Athenians that expert excellence wasn't only undemocratic but really anti-democratic. This fashionable and, it appears, calculated hostility closer to the council is a mark on the in any other case awesome intellectual and creative file of historic Athens.

This enmity towards the professional counsel had, in the long run, truly disastrous results for the Athenian legal guru. Painting under the constant blows of popular disfavor, he continued to display all the grave faults that are common to the early onsets of every great calling. Being unfit to grow and develop into respectability, he simply remained infamous. 

Further than that, supposedly in a spirit of undisciplined and short-sighted defiance, not many legal interpreters at Athens feel to have delighted in their numerous and serious moral and specialized failings. All this may explain the nearly complete absence among Athenian legal interpreters of professional capability, professional pride, and professional norms. 

Under these circumstances, no respectable legal profession could conceivably have evolved. Hence, it isn't surprising that professional norms specialized as well as ethical were commodities distinctly alien to Hence, it isn't surprising that professional norms specialized as well as ethical were commodities distinctly alien to the Athenian "counsel." Whenever social prejudice and adverse political pressure help the orderly emergence of an organized and self-respecting profession, no well-advised and disciplined tendency towards immortalizing that profession through the asseveration of specialized capability and staid address can develop! 

Had ancient Athens permitted its attorneys to exercise their profession freely and nobly in an atmosphere of benevolent cooperation; had it promoted rather than discouraged the healthy growth of a true legal profession and allowed its legal interpreters to achieve real excellence, pride of accomplishment, and elevation of position within the Athenian community, Athens presumably would have developed a class of attorneys and justices similar both in fame and attainment to the great Roman jurisconsults and lawyers.

How long have lawyers been around?

In the ultramodern world, the first Law School wasn't opened until 1100 AD in Bologna, Italy. Although people had been laboriously studying the spoken law since the BC period, it was the English King, Edward I, in the late 1200s AD, who spawned the foremost form of ultramodern attorneys through legal reforms in England. 

These early attorneys were called "barristers" and "solicitors," and they represented "for"" and "against" sides in legal controversies. It wasn't until the US Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791 that people in the US were guaranteed legal representation by the sixth amendment. One of the major attributes of the legal profession is that it's independent. 

This is veritably important, naturally. This independence can be as introductory as a counselor giving independent advice to his guests irrespective of the policy of the government of the day. It also involves a professional obligation to take up any case, especially those where public opinion is against the same.

The assertion of independence may also indicate that the professions should be free to regulate themselves by their own rules of professional conduct without hindrance from the government. Attorneys are necessary in a community. Some of you might take a different view, but as I'm a member of that legal profession, or was at one time, I still retain the pride of the profession. And I still contend that it's the law and the counsel that make popular government under a written constitution and written bills possible.

Is AI a threat to lawyers?

Will robots replace attorneys? Will artificial intelligence ultimately spare legal professionals? Will it beget a surge of massive severance in the army? That’s been the largest debate on the felony tech scene the reason I joined it six to seven years in the past.

It burned up from time to time when Richard Susskind wrote about commodities on LinkedIn or a new AI incipiency surfaced with a massive new investment. Never forget the time when Vice released a talkie film featuring an AI that proved capable of reviewing an NDA both briskly and with smaller crimes than its mortal counterpart. 

The debate was generally relatively disunited. In one corner were the doomsayers advising about the total collapse of the legal profession, ruin, mass severance, and thingamabob. On the other hand, disbelievers were calling for everybody to calm down. Machines would never be suitable to contend with a well-trained counsel, they said.

I was always nearly in between. AI was surely the future, I said, but the technology wasn’t mature. So rather than agitating these academic scripts, we should concentrate on the basics, harness our data, and automate as much as we can with sense-based systems. Too much attention was given to hamstrung and immature AI products while proven technologies were largely ignored, which kept the legal community uninhabited technologically. I wanted less hype. A little less discussion, a little more action

How to become an attorney UK?

Getting a lawyer via the university route requires you to complete a qualifying law degree( LLB) before taking the Solicitors Qualifying Examination( SQE), which will ultimately replace the Graduate Parchment in Law( GDL) and Legal Practice Course( LPC), although there are transitional arrangements in place up to 2032 for those who started their law degree, GDL, or LPC before September 2021 and would like to qualify via the traditional route. 

Those who studied an unconnected subject at the undergraduate level may find it helpful to embark on a law conversion course and/or an SQE medication course before sitting the examinations. The next step on the SQE route is to complete two years of qualifying legal work experience, which can include a training contract, before passing the Solicitors Regulation Authority's ( SRA) character and felicity conditions. 

You can also apply for admission to the role of solicitor. It's also possible to complete a Solicitor Apprenticeship, which is a six-month, Level 7 program aimed at A-level graduates, paralegals, and chartered legal directors. Find out more about law internships. To become a barrister in England and Wales, you need to complete at least three stages or factors of training. 

These include academic element( law degree)  vocational element( a Bar course)  work- grounded literacy element( pupillage).  After completing all training factors, you will be ready to apply for residency as a fully employed barrister in chambers or go into practice as an employed barrister.


table of contents title